User talk:Fredrik

This user may have left Wikipedia. Fredrik has not edited Wikipedia since August 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

< User:Fredrik

Old talk can be found in the archive. Add any new comments to the bottom of this page.

Gamma function

Hello - Could you please check out the talk page on the Gamma function about some plots that you generated? - Thanks - PAR 09:20, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Peter Travers; Ihara zeta function; Prime power; Glaisher-Kinkelin constant; Adrian Carmack; Landau's constants; Chen prime; Primorial prime; Lefschetz zeta function; Barnes G-function; Sphenic number; Hilbert's program; Ramanujan-Soldner constant; Masahiko Fujiwara; Unitary perfect number; Euler prime; Bohr–Mollerup theorem; Integrable function; 163 (number)

Cleanup: Topological manifold; Antioxidant; Euclid number
Merge: Sudan function; Half-life; Potential function
Add Sources: Theodor Kaluza; Arcturus; Cofinality
Wikify: IEC 61499; Latin conjugation; Pornography in the United States
Expand: Chitin; Demographic history of the United States; Non-equilibrium thermodynamics

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sidebar redesign final vote!

It's that special, special time! No, grandma's not coming over. No, not time to clean out the fridge. It's sidebar redesign voting time! Yes, the community has narrowed it down to 3 different options, and a vote for the same old original sidebar is a choice one could vote for as well. Voting for multiple options is allowed, and discussion on the whole shebang is right there on the vote page itself.

You're probably getting this message because the sidebar fairy (JoeSmack for now) noticed you commented on the project at some time over on at Wikipedia talk:Village pump (proposals)/Sidebar redesign. Lovely. JoeSmack ^Talk 06:34, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent reversal of patent nonsense on prime numbers

Since the editor seemingly very recently acquired a brand new user, perhaps you could try to put a messag to User_talk:Laljag, stating I reverted your edit since it was nonsense, but welcome anyhow in an as friendly manner at possible :-) ? JoergenB 12:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right; I should do this more often, but it gets quite tiresome after the hundredth revert. Granted, template messages like Template:Welcome have been created to make the work easier, but finding a template that fits the occasion is almost as much work as writing one. Fredrik Johansson 14:15, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your revert

The images will look the same. And infoboxes are far more flexible. Are you familiar with infoboxes? --Jtir 12:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're just introducing unnecessary complexity and inconsistency. Please explain what you are going to use this extra flexibility for. Fredrik Johansson 12:15, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Text alignment can be controlled. I have centered some captions and left aligned others. The alignment may need some tweaking. Further, they eliminate clutter -- namely the small resize icon that indicates the image is a thumbnail. In some cases the result has been a smaller box, which saves screen space. Also they support titles above the boxes if editors feel those would be desirable. Have you looked at any of the edits I have made? --Jtir 12:24, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't like the size, icon and alignment, you can edit your own stylesheet to that end. I want image boxes in this article to look the way they do in other articles when I view them, thank you. Fredrik Johansson 12:40, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most readers of the encyclopedia probably don't have your ability to edit stylesheets. What differences have you noticed after the changes I have made? --Jtir 12:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another advantage to infoboxes is that images and captions can be stacked more densely, as this sandbox example shows. --Jtir 13:21, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stegosaurus

Hi Fredrik!

I'm planning to send Stegosaurus to Featured Article candidacy. The article failed its first nomination, but user:Casliber and I have been hard at work fixing stuff. As you're listed as a member of Wikipedia: WikiProject Dinosaurs (founder, actually), I figured I'd drop you a line and see if there was anything you thought should be added/removed/cited on the article before it is sent to FAC. We definitely want it to pass! :)

(Feel free to make any edits on the article itself, comment on the talk page, or leave a note on my talk page). Thanks for your time, Firsfron of Ronchester 19:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Doom mapformat screen.png

Hello, i would like to move this image on Commons, but screenshot with copyrighted content are not allowed in Commons. I would like to know if texture used are free ? and if no, do you think you can do the same picture with free content (i know FreeDoom replace all unfree content of Doom). Thanks a lot. fr:user:bayo 193.248.38.17 17:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can do a free version, but not this instant. Fredrik Johansson 17:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, i can wait :) I already move Commons:Image:Doom_mapformat_map.png on Commons. Another little thing, it will be nice to release another screenshot (of Image:Doom mapformat screen.png) without comment, because it's more easy to translate english image without alterating the picture. 193.248.38.17 17:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UK Roundabout

An image you are listed as having worked on is up for delisting as a featured picture: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/UK Roundabout delist. The image creator is gore from Wikipedia, but you apparently made the most recent version. One of the main criticisms is that the frame rate of the animation is poor and that a higher frame rate at the expense of file size would be beneficial. Would you care to comment, or can you make an improved version? --Dgies 04:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Graphics Lab

I saw your name listed on Wikiproject Illustration or the list of graphic artists, and I thought I'd let you know that a Graphics Lab has been created on EN. Based on the highly successful French and German graphics labs, it seeks to better organise and coordinate our graphic design and photo-editing efforts. Up until now, there has been no common space on EN where users could ask for maps, charts and other SVG files to be created. What's more, the Graphics Lab has discussion boards, tips, tools and links; in sum, a good common workspace. Come help us out! The infrastucture is already in place, and now we need participants. :) --Zantastik talk 00:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Doom_darkness.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Doom_darkness.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Talk:Lion

You don't seem to be an established vandal from what I can tell, but this sort of edit is totally inappropriate. Anything like that again will probably result in a ban. Richard001 03:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goodness, sorry. I've been seeing a bit too much vandalism lately and I must have been a bit hasty. I thought you were a vandal using google as a reference :) Richard001 05:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Python-logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Python-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Metroid_II_gameplay.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Metroid_II_gameplay.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Super_Metroid_Tourian.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Super_Metroid_Tourian.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:12, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Super_Metroid_inventory.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Super_Metroid_inventory.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey i was just browsing through the doom article and I noticed you took most of the screenshots featured on it. I've tried taking screens with the print screen button, but they always gome out muddled. How do you take yours? Reply on my talk page (not much there though) Arc88 21:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Doom ingame 2.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Doom ingame 2.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:User_Fredrik_skin.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:User_Fredrik_skin.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 22:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Doomworld.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Doomworld.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Doom gibs.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Doom gibs.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:19, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Doom_single-player_E3M6.ogg

I have tagged Image:Doom_single-player_E3M6.ogg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 07:17, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Super Metroid statues.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Super Metroid statues.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —♦♦ SʘʘTHING^(Я) 10:45, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitroid

Hey, I'm Richard1990. I've adopted Wikitroid and I was just wondering if you would ever come back and edit it again. I've redone a lot with it, and now we need more articles. So come look at it sometime to see what it looks like now ok?--Richard (Talk - Contribs) 21:41, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Space elevator FAR

Space elevator has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ROT13

ROT13 has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. hbdragon88 21:58, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:John_Carmack_working.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:John_Carmack_working.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Chick Corea Collection.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Chick Corea Collection.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Angr 14:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Chick Corea Collection.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Chick Corea Collection.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 14:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Return to Forever.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Return to Forever.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 14:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of video games based on licensed properties

List of video games based on licensed properties, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of video games based on licensed properties satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of video games based on licensed properties and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of video games based on licensed properties during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 19:26, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:John Carmack working.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:John Carmack working.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lyrl^Talk _C 02:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for FAR

Doom has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 19:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Permission

Dear Fredrik,

The image is downloaded by you under the licence {{gfdl}}.

Can I use the image on the Back Cover of my Magazine if I credit the photographer: Hans E C Johansson, 2004 on the Back Cover or by crediting the photographer on the Image inside of the Magazine if I am using it twice. Kaystar 15:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Fredrik,

I will let you know the Magazine via your e-mail (at the moment for certain unavoidable reasons I have to keep it top secret the identity of the Magazine). Could you leave your e-mail.Kaystar 16:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have e-mailed the information. Thanks.Kaystar 16:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Kaystar 17:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tag for Ron Rivest

Unspecified source for Image:Ron Rivest.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ron Rivest.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Cbdorsett 11:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Egyptian Swedish cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The Egyptian Swedish cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image question

Dear Fredrik; you say you currently edit very little, but allow my to post at your talk page. If the deletion backlogs on Commons continue to drag on as they currently are, you should have at least 2 months to deal with the issue.

An image you uploaded and tagged as taken by your dad, never got tagged with a license. I added a license to it -- GFDL-presumed -- but now I demand to get it properly certified or deleted, and have nominated the image for deletion. If you wish to respond, please do so here: commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Björnskalletjärn.jpg. Truly yours, Fred-J 22:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Impact event.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Impact event.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 83.77.1.76 23:32, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DOOM-E1M4-development.png

I have tagged Image:DOOM-E1M4-development.png as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 00:17, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Lars Hörmander 1988.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Lars Hörmander 1988.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 03:59, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Troy-poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Troy-poster.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 03:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Neil Young Neil Young album cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Neil Young Neil Young album cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Metroid II gameplay.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Metroid II gameplay.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Super Metroid Tourian.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Super Metroid Tourian.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pi

I've used much of your work on User:Fredrik/Pi to clean up the article in order to get it closer to GA status. Just letting you know that your work has not gone to waste :) —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 00:13, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Painter's algorithm.png

An image you uploaded, Image:Painter's algorithm.png, is being considered for featured picture delisting, as an editor no longer feels it meets the featured picture criteria. If you would like to comment, please do so here: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Painter's algorithm. Calliopejen1 21:04, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Neil Young After the Gold Rush booklet photo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Neil Young After the Gold Rush booklet photo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 21:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Sandy Petersen.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Sandy Petersen.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 19:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bantha

I have nominated Bantha, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bantha. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. David Fuchs^(talk) 20:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Batman Doom.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Batman Doom.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Doom 02.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Doom 02.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Doom Tei Tenga.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Doom Tei Tenga.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Neil Young Weld album cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Neil Young Weld album cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ISO dates

What do you think of User:Omegatron/Date formatting? — Omegatron 04:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Final Doom box cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Final Doom box cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 02:12, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Doom 2 cover artwork.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Doom 2 cover artwork.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 02:24, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Doom-boxart.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Doom-boxart.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 16:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Billdoom.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Billdoom.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 16:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Mainexperiment

A tag has been placed on Template:Mainexperiment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bruce Campbell Army of Darkness.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bruce Campbell Army of Darkness.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PICT2367.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:PICT2367.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Artillery (band) logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Artillery (band) logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Doom-boxart.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Doom-boxart.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Holland Land Company

Hello Fredrik, can you do me a favour and upload the map of the Holland Purchase to Commons, or send me a copy, with all the information you have on the date or the publisher? I wrote an article in the Dutch Wikipedia about Gerrit Boon. I like to use the map, probably also for a lemma on the Holland Land Company.Taksen (talk) 19:45, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BBP-like formulas I came up with

Hi,

Few days ago I came up with this three symbol Pi BBP derivative formula

Maple Pi= 2/3 * (-1 + Sum(7/(4*k+1) - 6/(4*k+3) - 1/(4*k+5),k = 0 .. infinity)

PARI Pi= 2/3 * (-1 + suminf(k=0, 7/(4*k+1) - 6/(4*k+3) - 1/(4*k+5)))

Jon Borwein doesn't think that this result is "interesting" - see below (though his approach in getting my formula doesn't sound like exact science to me, since it requires for everyone to do what I did, that is to perform the "trial and error" search for the formula).

BTW, Jesus Guillera is not so *negative* in his formula assessment (see my Google chat with him further below). From: Jon Borwein Any rational has a BBP formula. If a, b have BBP formulas so does a+b. At the crudest level: find a formula for each number in base b and add them. Then use simplification tools to remove redundant terms. 12:46 PM me to Jesús Guillera : Nov 30 (2 days ago) Maple Pi= 2/3 * (-1 + Sum(7/(4*k+1) - 6/(4*k+3) - 1/(4*k+5),k = 0 .. infinity) Hi Jesus - is above easy to obtain ? Jesús Guillera to me 1:04 PM Jesús: Hi Alex, there is an easy proof of that formula if you convert it in an integral. For it, observe that... 1:07 PM int_(0,1) x ^ (4n+a) = 1 / (4n+a+1) 1:09 PM me: Thanks ! 1:10 PM Is it worth posting or it is so trivial ? 1:16 PM Jesús: The proof is easy but it can be interesting if one does not know the method. The formula converges slowly because there is not a factor like for example 1/16^k. Also for whatever it is worth, here is the alternative formula for ln(3) which I derived and which is not listed in http://www.mathworld.wolfram.com/BBP-TypeFormula.html ln(3) = 1/4*(1+ Sum((1/(9)^(k+1))*(27/(2*k+1) + 4/(2*k+2) + 1/(2*k+3)), k = 0 .. infinity) ) Apovolot (talk) 20:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

4^x - x^4

Hi Fredrik. Love the images! How did you create them? (I ask because I work in R and we have a similar functionality, but I never seem to manage to create such zingy graphics). Cheers, Robinh (talk) 20:19, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This was done with matplotlib, using the wrapper function cplot in mpmath.

from mpmath import *
cplot(lambda x: sign(4**x-x**4), [-20, 20], [-20, 20], points=50000)

Nothing particularly fancy about it; just sampling the function across a grid, mapping function values onto RGB, and displaying the image. I guess much of the zinginess (is that a word?) comes from the choice of color function. Fredrik Johansson 20:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:DEU.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DEU.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ysangkok (talk) 01:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Painter's algorithm.psp.bz2

A tag has been placed on File:Painter's algorithm.psp.bz2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip [i.e. a Word document or PDF file] that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Painter's algorithm.psp.bz2|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. User A1 (talk) 06:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

from WikiCommons

I saw an image on Bernoulli numbers from you ...you may have interest in one I just posted http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:OEIS_A156053.svg--Billymac00 (talk) 19:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Super Metroid ingame.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Super Metroid ingame.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photo to Drawing

Hi Fredrik, I noticed your photo to action script with PIL in Python. It would be a nice addition to Phatch, an open source Photo Batch processor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phatch, http://photobatch.wikidot.com Would you be interested in converting it in a plugin for Phatch? It is really easy as Phatch generates automagically the user interface. http://photobatch.wikidot.com/writing-actions Contact me at spe.stani.be somewhere at gmail(com). 6 June 2009 Stani —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.194.147.195 (talk) 23:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Wayback Machine/redirects

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Fredrik! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 232 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Tobias Bjarneby - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Dave D. Taylor - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Minako Hamano - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Minako Hamano

The article Minako Hamano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No interviews or biographies available to expand/source the article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Prince (talk) 00:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Super Mario 64 jumping.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Super Mario 64 jumping.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:25, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mini Christmas tree.png

Thank you for uploading File:Mini Christmas tree.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:57, 28 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FinalRapture - † ☪ 22:57, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Simple supply and demand color.png

Thank you for uploading File:Simple supply and demand color.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Doom Bible map.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Doom Bible map.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:36, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Doom Construction Kit cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Doom Construction Kit cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:41, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:23, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mini Christmas tree.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Mini Christmas tree.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:49, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Super Metroid Mother Brain tank.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Super Metroid Mother Brain tank.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:15, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Dave Taylor.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dave Taylor.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:43, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Doom-boxart.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Doom-boxart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:32, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:The Doom Hacker's Guide cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Doom Hacker's Guide cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:22, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Holonomic function, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hadamard product and Ideal (mathematics) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Impact event size?

Thanks for contributing the impact event file [1]! Do you have a sense of how large (in km) the asteroid you drew in is supposed to be? That would help guide in where it is and isn't appropriate to use the image in wikipedia, and what to put for the caption. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 08:15, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:VG Interview

This hasn't hit the mainstream yet, but today is an important day for WP:VG. We've reached our 10 year anniversary! The WP:VG Newsletter crew are interested in running a feature this quarter on the early days of WP:VG and because you are one of the earliest contributors to the WikiProject, we need your help. In the last 10 years a lot has changed and we'd love to hear your perspective on it. One of the biggest changes may be your level of participation in the WikiProject or even in Wikipedia generally. This is why I'm contacting you almost 2 months before the newsletter is due to come out (it's due on April 2). I'm hoping that you'll have time somewhere between now and then to answer a few general questions reflecting on WP:VG and Wikipedia in general. Please contact me here if you would be willing to answer a few questions for our anniversary article. If you can participate, please mark this beside your name on the list, and if you can't participate please also mark this on the list by deleting your name or overstriking it. I hope this will be a fun and interesting quarter for the WP:VG Newsletter! Thanks in advance. -Thibbs (talk) 12:39, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS - If you'd prefer, I could also contact you by email. Let me know if that would be more convenient for you. -Thibbs (talk) 22:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tutankhamun-mask-retouched.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tutankhamun-mask-retouched.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:56, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ghostbusters Doom.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ghostbusters Doom.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Keyboard Layout Swedish.png

Thank you for uploading File:Keyboard Layout Swedish.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wouter van Oortmerssen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wouter van Oortmerssen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wouter van Oortmerssen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Msnicki (talk) 18:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New image would be appreciated

Hi Fredrik, I noticed you're very handy at producing high quality space images, such as [[file:impact_image.jpg]]. I've recently spent time upgrading B612 Foundation, which could use an image of a gravity tractor for its section of the same name. Any assistance you can provide with that would be greatly appreciated. By the way, B612 head Ed Lu was a co-inventor or the gravity tractor concept. Best HarryZilber (talk) 19:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Tim Willits.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tim Willits.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 11:36, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reversible inhibition of sperm under guidance

Greetings!

There is a link on User:Luke Powell to your talk page so I assume this is your account also? I see you've contributed to Reversible inhibition of sperm under guidance and would love your feedback on the kidney problems issue I have raised on the talk page.

Much appreciated.

amosabo^t@lk; 10:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Super Mario 64 jumping.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Super Mario 64 jumping.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Roger Richman Agency

The article The Roger Richman Agency has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:06, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:User Fredrik contribution graph.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:User Fredrik contribution graph.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Fredrik/Gamma

User:Fredrik/Gamma, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Fredrik/Gamma and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Fredrik/Gamma during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:24, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Orders of magnitude sidebar

Template:Orders of magnitude sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:07, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Doomworld.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Doomworld.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like NationStates

Hey! If you're interested, I started a series of userboxes for the game NationStates. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 04:52, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doom game details listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Doom game details. Since you had some involvement with the Doom game details redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:03, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DOOM game details listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect DOOM game details. Since you had some involvement with the DOOM game details redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Triangular number 21.png

The file File:Triangular number 21.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bantha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bantha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bantha (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:48, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible example on Stable sorting

Would you be interested giving opinions or suggestions on a stable sorting example page I'm constructing. A first draft is found at Talk:Sorting_algorithm#How_is_this_stable_sort_example?

Also a newer, evolving, example is found in my sandbox at: User:Lent/sandbox .

And out of curiosity, did you know that a Shift-click on a Wikipedia sortable table column does a secondary sort?

Thanks!--Lent (talk) 11:45, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Maass form" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Maass form. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 15#Maass form until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:28, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Karma whoring" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Karma whoring. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 23#Karma whoring until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bg-blue

Template:Bg-blue has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:48, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bg-red

Template:Bg-red has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:52, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Missing

Hi. You are now listed as missing, as we seek to recognize those editors who impacted the project and are no longer contributing. Should you ever return or simply don't want to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Please do not see this message as any sort of prod to your activity on wiki, as we all would hope to enjoy life after having edited here. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"NES Controller (Basic)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect NES Controller (Basic) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 8#NES Controller (Basic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:04, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Doom spin-offs and homages" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Doom spin-offs and homages and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 8#Doom spin-offs and homages until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 07:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Action Code Script

The article Action Code Script has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TarkusAB^talk/contrib 18:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]